Home About EJES Editorial board Author guidelines Current issue Archive Contact Centre for European Studies




EJES is a project of the Jean Monnet Centre of Excellence within the Centre for European Studies (CES), Alexandru Ioan Cuza University of Iasi, Romania.

EJES is a biannual (June and December), double-blind peer-reviewed academic journal. The issues of the journal will include multi and interdisciplinary papers. Occasionally, individual issues may focus on a particular theme.

The journal, launched in 2010, is to be published by the Alexandru Ioan Cuza University Press. The journal will also be available on-line, in order to ensure good visibility and dissemination of the research results.


aims and scope

The Eastern Journal of European Studies (EJES) seeks to provide a forum for multidisciplinary and interdisciplinary dialogue between ideas, and a framework for theoretical and empirical analyses covering major topics in European studies: European history, politics, European economy and European policies, EU community law, European culture and society.
EJES encourages studies focusing on Central and Eastern Europe (including Eastern Neighbourhood) in order to better understand its transformations induced by the integration process and to address its specific challenges by supporting scientific debates on the general European theory and practice. Furthermore, the editorial board regularly invites distinguished guest editors to coordinate thematic issues.


The papers can be sent for evaluation any time. For the first issue (June), the papers sent before 30th March will be taken into consideration, while for the second issue (December), the papers sent until 1ST October will be considered.

Submitted papers must be sent to EJES by e-mail, in attachment (compatible with Microsoft Office, see Author guidelines)

EJES does not require any publication fee.

E-mail adress: ejes@uaic.ro


The Centre for European Studies within Alexandru Ioan Cuza University of Iași is committed to promote the dissemination of its research outputs. In order to support dissemination, CES provides an unrestricted on-line access to all the issues published by EJES as defined by the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY).


EJES publishes original papers which are not describing essentially the same research as in other manuscripts and which have not previously been published, or submitted for reviewing to other journals. 
The CES shall not be held legally responsible and shall not pay royalties in case of demands for financial compensations from third parties. In case of acceptance for publishing, EJES does not impose the exclusive right to publish and disseminate the paper. The article may be re-published, provided the author makes reference to the first publication by EJES.
The ideas in the papers represent the views of the authors only, not the views of the Centre for European Studies, of Editors, or of the International Advisory Board members.

INDEXATION  EJES is indexed by



All research articles proposed for publishing in Eastern Journal of European Studies (EJES) need to undergo a rigorous review. The peer review process respects the originality and personal opinions of the authors, but reserves the editor's right to demand changes, based on reviewers' comments in order to preserve high scientific quality and our readers' interest. The review process consists in an initial editor screening and an anti-plagiarism scan using our specialised software. If the manuscript passes the initial tests, it is being sent to at least two reviewers in order to be blindly evaluated. If neither reviewer recommends rejecting the manuscript, this will be sent back to author/s for being revised. After revision, the manuscripts are undergoing a final English proofreading process.

EJES is concerned about assuring a high quality research standard and an ethical behaviour for all the parties involved in publication process (editors, authors and reviewers). Therefore, EJES adopted an ethic code based on the guidelines developed by the 
Committee on Publications Ethics (COPE).


Review and publication decision |


The editor has complete responsibility and authority to accept or reject a submitted manuscript. Based on an initial screening process the editor decides whether the manuscript is suitable for review or not. The reviewing process consists in an initial check for plagiarism using a specialized anti-plagiarism software and requiring opinions from at least two anonymous reviewers. The editor reserves the right to reject the manuscript, considering reviewers' opinions or any concerns relating copyright or plagiarism violations. Furthermore, the editor may refuse to publish future articles from the authors who have committed plagiarism When necessary, editors should be willing to publish corrections, clarifications, retractions and apologies.

Discrimination | 

An editor should evaluate all manuscripts submitted for publication without regard to race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship and respecting the intellectual independence of the authors.

Confidentiality |

The editor and any editorial staff should treat manuscripts as confidential documents, not providing information about submitted manuscripts, to anyone else except for the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers or other editorial advisers.

Privileged information |

The editor should not use the information gained from unpublished submitted manuscripts for its own research, unless obtaining the author's consent.   

Conflicts of interest |

Any potential conflict of interest relating to a manuscript should be disclosed to the editor in chief.

Appealing publication decision |

An authors may contest the decision of rejecting his submitted manuscript. The final decision is taken by the editor in chief. In order to decide, the editor in chief may consult other editorial members or reviewers.

Corrections and retraction |

If after publication errors are identified, the editor will ask author to make necessary corrections, mentioning the date when corrections have been made. If these corrections are significant, implying the invalidation of a considerable part of the research, the manuscript should be retracted, indicating the reason for this decision.


Multiple or concurrent publication | 

Authors should ensure that they submit original manuscripts, which are not describing essentially the same research as in other manuscripts and which have not previously been published. Authors should not submit the same manuscript to more than one journal at the same time.

Originality and plagiarism | 

Authors should make sure they appropriately cite/quote when using work of other authors. Plagiarism constitutes unethical scientific behaviour and is not acceptable, whether is related to copying or paraphrasing the work of others without mention it or in any other form. 

Access to manuscript data |

Authors must be prepared to provide the raw data for editorial review if requested and should be prepared to retain such data for a reasonable time after publication.

Conflicts of interest |

Authors should disclose to the editor in chief any financial or other substantive conflict of interest that might influence the results or interpretation of their manuscript.

Errors after publication |

When an error/inaccuracy is identified after the manuscript has been published, it is authors' responsibility to correct/retract the manuscript.

* a publication agreement will be signed by authors


Objectivity |

Reviewing process should be objectively done. Reviewers should complete the evaluation form by providing clear and concise recommendations in order to improve manuscripts, but without knowing any information regarding their authors. If they recommend that a manuscript should not been published they should justify their views. 
Reviewers may be asked to read the revised manuscript if there are concerns that the paper has not been revised according to their recommendations.
If the reviewers consider that they are unqualified in order to evaluate the manuscript or the objectivity/correctness of evaluation is threatened by any reason he should announce the editor. 

Originality |

It is reviewers' responsibility to notify the editor if they consider that the submitted paper is very similar to another paper they have previously read, either as reviewers or in print.

Source citations |

The reviewers should include in the recommendations they provide to the authors any concerns regarding omitted citations.

Privileged information |

The reviewer should not use the information gained from reviewing submitted manuscripts for its own research or personal advantage, unless obtaining the author's consent.


ISSN print edition: 2068-651X | ISSN on-line edition: 2068-6633



The Centre for European Studies - Alexandru Ioan Cuza University of Iasi © 2010